From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-18 08:57:01
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>> My gut feeling is that this is the wrong moment to introduce a
>> breaking change like this, especially as you're changing the
>> compiler's default behaviour. Given enough time it's
>> work-aroundable, but it's time I'd rather
>> not spend just at present, and besides I would expect this to break
>> libraries like random and interval as well. If you want to make
>> this an option for Boost.Test that's fine, it's making this the
>> default in the run up to a release that I'm not happy with.
> Ok. How about if I make this optional and disabled by default for
> now. But make it enabled by default after 1.35?
I'd say disabled for now, then ask and see what users want after 1.35 :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk