Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-20 03:00:58

Next message: Martin Wille: "Re: [boost] [test] Changes break Borland support"
Previous message: Dave Jenkins: "Re: [boost] [intrusive] Looking for some advice on intrusive splaytrees"
In reply to: Gennadiy Rozental: "Re: [boost] [test] Another Boost.Test failure."

> John Maddock <john <at> johnmaddock.co.uk> writes:
>
>
> There are more Boost.Test failures coming through caused by the recent
> changes - this time Intel-10 on Win64 is failing most of the math lib
> tests
> with: http://tinyurl.com/2quy5h

Should be fixed now

Next message: Martin Wille: "Re: [boost] [test] Changes break Borland support"
Previous message: Dave Jenkins: "Re: [boost] [intrusive] Looking for some advice on intrusive splaytrees"
In reply to: Gennadiy Rozental: "Re: [boost] [test] Another Boost.Test failure."

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk