From: John Torjo (john.groups_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-23 07:41:40
> not sure whether you are also interested in my feedback as you ignored
> already two mails from me with simple patches. Nevertheless I attached my
> mail again ...
Sorry 'bout that - it's not my fault - though I should have replied to
the mailing list.
The idea is I definitely took your comments into account - and you'll
see that if you take a look at the latest sources.
Here's the problem (when I replied to your email):
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<jensseidel_at_[hidden]>:
host mail.sourceforge.net [188.8.131.52]: 550-Postmaster verification failed while checking <john.code_at_[hidden]>
550-Sent: RCPT TO:<postmaster_at_[hidden]>
550-Response: 550 No such email address
550-Several RFCs state that you are required to have a postmaster
550-mailbox for each mail domain. This host does not accept mail
550-from domains whose servers reject the postmaster address.
550 Sender verify failed
Here's the original message:
Received: from [184.108.40.206] (port=2249)
by europe.hosted4ever.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
id 1IiOav-00047P-Gd; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:11:00 +0300
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:10:49 +0300
From: John Torjo <john.code_at_[hidden]>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 220.127.116.11 (Windows/20070728)
To: Jens Seidel <jensseidel_at_[hidden]>
Subject: Re: Comments to Boost.Log2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> > Hi John,
> > I was very surprised to read today on your homepage that you continue
Thanks ;) It's been a crazy time for me, but I'm finally coping :)
> > working on Boost.log. Great! I suggest you announce it on the boost-user
> > list.
Good point . First, I need to subscribe to it :)
> > On this list I recently posted a few comments for you, as I failed in
> > the past to contact you (and considered the project death). See
> > http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2007/09/30970.php
I've seen them now - you're right about the levels stuff - I've
corrected it in v2. I'm not maintaining v1 since v2 is sooooo much better!
> > OK, a few further comments to your new version 2:
> > * The zip archive contains object files. Please remove these.
Sorry 'bout that - I think I've removed them already. Anyway, could you
give me the file names, just to make sure I don't miss them in the future?
> > * Are you aware that the licenses of e.g. lib/logging/tests/template.cpp
> > and boost/logging/defaults.hpp are different? Is this wanted?
> > * Some code contains: "See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt".
> > I miss this file in your archive.
> > * "generating the docs.txt" Please avoid using spaces in names. You are
> > probably aware that a few filesystems are not able to store such
> > files (e.g. ISO 9660 without Rock Ridge or Joliet extensions).
> > It makes writing shell scripts also harder as a space is a word
> > separator in most shells (e.g. bash) (for file in *; do ...).
> > * I attached a patch which allows your test code to be compiled by
> > fixing errors and warnings. A single warning remains which I marked
> > in the code in a comment.
Yup, thanks - fixed it.
> > I added a Makefile to simplify the task of compiling. Read it to see
> > the compiler flags I used. Used compiler:
> > $ /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ --version
> > g++ (Debian 20070916-1) 4.3.0 20070916 (experimental) [trunk revision 128522]
Thanks for the makefile - unfortunately I can't use it because boost
uses jam - so I need to somehow make a jamfile to build the tests :)
Note: the modifications are in SVN:
(I update the .zip file only once in a while - like, every 2 weeks or so
And more info :
-- http://John.Torjo.com -- C++ expert ... call me only if you want things done right
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk