Re: [boost] [thread] Failed assertions under Borland?

From: Anthony Williams (anthony_w.geo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-24 08:01:38

"John Maddock" <john_at_[hidden]> writes:

> Anthony Williams wrote:
>> That code is there to support move semantics for thread. It compiles
>> OK on Borland 5.8.2.
>>
>> This should be a direct constructor call. Any ideas for a Borland
>> 5.6.4 workaround?
>
> Yep, with this patch it builds OK, and the regex test passes again:

I've checked in something similar.

> Running through the thread regression tests I still see quite a few failures 
> though: some are dependencies on the string library that are failing, the 
> timeout failures look more worrying though.  Logfile attached.

Thanks for the log file. This is concerning. I'll see what I can do.

Anthony
-- 
Anthony Williams
Just Software Solutions Ltd - http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk
Registered in England, Company Number 5478976.
Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL