From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-29 08:01:50
> Daniel Walker wrote:
>> Thanks. Yeah, I see Thorsten is in the processes of removing the
>> checks with constant iterators. Has something changed with that? No
>> more range_const_iterator?
> Hmm, I'm not sure about Thorsten's thought.
> range_iterator is now nothing but a "client" metafunction
> which uses range_mutable_iterator and range_const_iterator.
> range_iterator should not be placed into concepts.hpp, IMHO.
You would rather see range_mutable_iterator and range_const_iterator there?
What is the guideline one should follow?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk