From: David Rodríguez Ibeas (dibeas_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-31 12:16:13
I am new to Boost libraries, and each so often I look for some
functionality that might be implemented in a Boost library --logging,
exception, ...-- some of the libraries that I want are still in work
(logging) or pending approval (exception), but it does not seem easy to
detect this from the docs. I believe that requiring all proposals'
documentation to have a reference to its current review state would be
interesting while not time demanding for the developers.
What I am proposing is that in any and all not-yet-approved library that
is proposed to boost the docs (ideally close to the title) document the
status, for example in
or something alike.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk