Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-31 12:22:11

on Sat Oct 27 2007, Vladimir Prus <> wrote:

> Over at there's a page for Boost.Build, at:
> the content of which is exactly what was in the last
> Boost release. There's another page for Boost.Build,
> namely, content of which
> is regenerated nightly, using SVN state.
> The first page, generally, is outdated and wrong. For
> example, now it points a Milestone 11 downloads while
> current version of Boost.Build is M12, talks about CVS
> (and links to a page that does not say how to get
> anything from either CVS or SVN), points to development
> roadmap that is totally inaccurate, and so on.
> Generally, both the download and documentation links
> at will yield better results
> to a user.
> Are there any objections to making the up-to-date
> docs page the one most easily found, and making docs corresponding
> to the last release only found via some "doc archive", or not
> accessible at all?

Seems like a good idea for now. Hopefully at some point in the
future, the docs will catch up with the releases and we will probably
want to revisit that decision.

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at