From: David Rodríguez Ibeas (dibeas_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-31 14:28:01
Question is that there are some libraries that have been approved for next
release, but that are not in the current release (1.34), some are in SVN
(Generic Image Library, Bimap,...), some not even there (binary_int might be
an example). The total amount of such libraries, as listed in
http://www.boost.org/more/formal_review_schedule.html is up to 15, not
including those that are accepted provisionally. I am currently checking in
the above link, but I would rather have a comment in the library docs.
On 10/31/07, Sebastian Redl <sebastian.redl_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> David Rodríguez Ibeas wrote:
> > What I am proposing is that in any and all not-yet-approved library
> > is proposed to boost the docs (ideally close to the title) document the
> > status, for example in
> > http://www.revergestudios.com/boost-exception/boost-exception.htm title
> > could read:
> What's wrong with simply checking whether you're on the www.boost.org
> domain or not? If you can't find the docs for the library there, it's
> not in any released Boost version.
> That said, I'm pretty sure this is already a requirement.
> Sebastian Redl
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk