Boost logo

Boost :

From: Simon Francis (thejello_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-01 16:48:02


Would this not break all code currently using the templated allocator
version of boost::function? I would call that not at all appropriate for a
dot release, and should be avoided outright if possible.

On 11/1/07, Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
> Emil Dotchevski wrote:
> > Any chance of incorporating
> >
> > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2308.html
> >
> > into boost::function for the 1.35.1 release? Here is a link to my
> > implementation, including a SVN patch file:
> >
> > http://www.revergestudios.com/boost-function/
> >
> > I've tested with MSVC 8 and 9, and with gcc 3.4.4.
>
>
> Funny, we haven't even released 1.35 yet, and you're already assuming
> we'll need a point release. ;-) It's too late to add new features for
> 1.35, and a point release is for bug fixes only, so I'd imagine the
> earliest somthing like this can go in would be 1.36.
>
>
> --
> Eric Niebler
> Boost Consulting
> www.boost-consulting.com
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk