From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-03 19:32:55
on Sat Nov 03 2007, Edward Diener <eldiener-AT-tropicsoft.com> wrote:
> Beman Dawes wrote:
>> Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>> David Abrahams wrote:
>>>> http://boost.org/more/bugs.htm still says that the preferred way to
>>>> report bugs is to send an email message. Do we really mean that?
>>>> It's way more reliable to open a Trac ticket. Is there any reason not
>>>> to change the "preferred" approach?
>>> That might well lead to zillion Trac tickets to triage. It might make
>>> sense to use a policy similar to subversion's:
>>> 1. Post to list
>>> 2. If somebody agrees it looks like a bug, and nobody jumps and
>>> immediately fixes it, enter to Trac
>> That sounds better to me, because bugs posted to the list often get
>> fixed a lot faster. But I'd modify it slightly:
>> 1. Post to list.
>> 2. If it doesn't get fixed immediately, and no one points out it isn't
>> really a bug, create a Trac bug report.
> Are errors in documentation considered bugs ?
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk