Re: [boost] [thread] thread interruption semantics

From: Preston A. Elder (prez_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-13 23:09:30

On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 03:22:29 +0000, Preston A. Elder wrote:

> So, is it possible to get this fixed? :)

.. And while I'm at it, a way to cancel pending interrupts would also be 
good.  If I know an interrupt has been requested (hell, thread-
>interruption_requested() tells me that), I should be able to cancel the 
pending interrupt and take action myself.  Rather than having to acquire 
a lock spuriously so I can get interrupted (which clears the pending 
interrupt) and catch the exception to THEN take action.

PreZ :)