Boost logo

Boost :

From: Boris Gubenko (Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-19 15:33:18


I thought it may be some bad conditionalization in the Boost sources for gcc
3.4, but preprocessed file generated by gcc 3.4.2 compiles just fine with gcc
4.2.1.

So, it really looks like a bug/feature of gcc 3.4 series.

FWIW,
  Boris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Boris Gubenko" <Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Cc: "Boris Gubenko" <Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 8:56 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] [Bimap][1.35] Regressions problems in Sun-5.9 and HP-UX

> Matias Capeletto wrote:
>> There are a some regression problems for Boost.Bimap running on SunOS
>> and HP-UX.
>
> On HP-UX, it is only on the machine using gcc 3.4.2. From the website,
> it seems to me that gcc 3.4 series has a problem with bimap library.
>
> I'll see if I can spot something obvious. In the meantime, if you have
> access to a machine with gcc 3.4.x, any platform, you can investigate
> yourself. If gcc 3.4 is indeed the culprit, the tests will fail to
> compile.
>
> Thanks,
> Boris
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matias Capeletto" <matias.capeletto_at_[hidden]>
> To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 12:14 AM
> Subject: [boost] [Bimap][1.35] Regressions problems in Sun-5.9 and HP-UX
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There are a some regression problems for Boost.Bimap running on SunOS and
>> HP-UX.
>>
>> Detailed report:
>> http://boost.org/regression/trunk/developer/issues.html
>>
>> [ sun-5.9 ]
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> assign, foreach, lambda, property_map, range, serialization
>> test_bimap_assign, test_bimap_convenience_header, test_bimap_info
>> test_bimap_lambda, test_bimap_modify, test_bimap_mutable
>> test_bimap_operator_bracket, test_bimap_ordered, test_bimap_project
>> test_bimap_property_map, test_bimap_range, test_bimap_sequenced
>> test_bimap_unconstrained, test_bimap_unordered, typeof, xpressive
>>
>> [ hp_cxx-71_006_tru64 ]
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> foreach, test_bimap_info, test_bimap_ordered, test_bimap_unordered
>>
>>
>> I am working blind here because I do not have access to these platforms.
>> I wish Boost.Bimap could support them for Boost 1.35.
>> Is there somebody willing to help me cleaning this regressions?
>>
>> Best regards
>> Matias
>> _______________________________________________
>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
>> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk