From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-20 21:18:02
Eric Niebler wrote:
> Joel de Guzman wrote:
>> Eric Niebler wrote:
>>> Joel de Guzman wrote:
>>>> Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote:
>>>>> In fact I think that fusion should provide function objects for
>>>>> every one of its algorithm.
>>>> That used to be the case at one point. I'll re-consider this again.
>>> I'll second the motion.
>> Ok. I'll do it after 1.35 is branched. What's a good subnamespace
>> to put that in? We already have result_of::xxx.
> fusion::functional ?
That was my first thought. However, fusion has a "functional" module
-- the one with fuse/unfuse and dispatch to function/function objects.
This might cause confusion (no pun intended :-)).
I'm CC'ing Tobias.
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk