From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-22 06:02:10
> Joel de Guzman wrote:
>>> Is there any pitfall if `value_at` is the same as `at` under transform_view?
>> After some more thinking, yes.
> I still don't know why, but I know you are always right.
Nah. No one's always right ;-) I'm always open to discussions
> I understood it probably.
> If as_vector means "copy", rvalue should be passed to FunctionObject.
> In fact, I'm trying to implement "zip".
> If interested, see: http://tinyurl.com/22q6cl
> as_vector intercepts mutability.
> I'm now lost, but I will retry.
Dan Marsden probably faced the same problems as you when he
implemented fusion zip. I'm CC'ing him. I think he's the best
person to ask questions. In the meantime, you might want to
take a look at fusion zip.
> I really apologize my mega-noise.
Hey, I really appreciate discussions like this.
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk