Re: [boost] C++ Performance

From: Lars Gullik Bjønnes (larsbj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-25 13:00:02

Maik Beckmann <maikbeckmann_at_[hidden]> writes:

| Am Sonntag 25 November 2007 18:28:47 schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes:
>> Which brings be to a nother point: It is _very_ bad of a library to
>> require of the application to define NDEBUG to work properly.
>> (The application should be able to decide for itself how NDEBUG/assert
>> should be used.)
>> Ublas should stop using NDEBUG and create their own BOOST_UBLAS_DEBUG
>> or similar and use that instead.
>>
>> And I should probably go pester the ublas guys as well...
>
| I'm don't know if I got you wrong, but doesn't BOOST_UBLAS_NDEBUG provide what 
| you looking for?
| <boost/boost/numeric/ublas/detail/config.hpp>
| ...
| // Enable performance options in RELEASE mode
| #if defined (NDEBUG) || defined (BOOST_UBLAS_NDEBUG)
| ...
| </boost/boost/numeric/ublas/detail/config.hpp>

That seems to be unreleased code?

Hmm, or am I trying to beat up something does not exist. At lest in
1.33.1 BOOST_UBLAS_NDEBUG is not there. (same in 1.34 it seems)

But yes, that seems to provide what I am looking for. Now the rest of
the NDEBUG's must be looked at :-)

-- 
    Lgb