From: John Torjo (john.groups_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-26 11:42:29
> It might seem a minor point, but to me the ordering between info,
> warning, and debug is the wrong way around. In fact, I would say that
> debug should be the lowest level, followed by info, then warning.
> Reason being I would only want to see debug messages when I actually
> need to debug the program, but info messages and (more importantly)
> warnings should be producable in production releases.
While looking through my code, seems someone beat you to the punch :)
It's been suggested before, and implemented already:
-- http://John.Torjo.com -- C++ expert ... call me only if you want things done right
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk