From: John Torjo (john.groups_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-27 03:14:35
Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>>> The way I solved that in a (far more limited!) logging library for our
>>> own use was the following:
>>> - Never destroy the logging data structures -- allow them to leak. No
>>> risk of static ordering issues.
> Why not provide initialization and clean-up functions and let the user
> call them explicitly?
In v2, this is handled quite differently. So it doesn't apply - but I
have to come up with a solution :)
-- http://John.Torjo.com -- C++ expert ... call me only if you want things done right
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk