Re: [boost] BOOST_LOCAL_FUNCTION

From: Alexander Nasonov (alnsn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-27 12:16:11

Giovanni Piero Deretta <gpderetta <at> gmail.com> writes:

> >   int BOOST_LOCAL_FUNCTION(char c)

[ skiped because gmane believes I'm overquoting ]

> struct unnamed { static void _ (char c) {
>          std::cout << c << '\n';
>          return 1;
> }};
> 
> (&unnamed::_)('a');
> 
> It is ugly, but I find the BOOST_LOCAL_FUNCTION_DECL macros even
> uglier.

I disagree. It's not easy to recognise return type and arguments in your code.
--
Alexander