From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-04 11:11:58
on Mon Dec 03 2007, Anthony Williams <anthony_w.geo-AT-yahoo.com> wrote:
> David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> on Mon Dec 03 2007, Anthony Williams <anthony_w.geo-AT-yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> However, I did post a message asking for a fast-track review of it so that it
>>> could become a documented part of boost. The only response I got was "there's
>>> another implementation in the sandbox".
>> And that implementation is fatally flawed, I'm ashamed to say. We
>> should be using http://opensource.adobe.com/group__move__related.html
> How does that help with a movable-but-not-copyable type (such as
I'm not sure, frankly; the author of that library believes all types
are intrinsically both movable and copiable. Maybe for that purpose
we need something else.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk