Re: [boost] [rfc] A light weight statically typed matrix template class (again?)

From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-06 14:44:07

On 12/06/07 12:37, Andreas Harnack wrote:
> Hi @,
> 
> shouldn't there be at least an elementary matrix class available
> in the standard? I notice there have been some discussions in
[snip]
> Any interest? Comments most welcome!
> Andreas
What's the advantage of this over the specialization of multi_array:

http://www.boost.org/libs/multi_array/doc/reference.html

to just 2 dimensions?