From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-07 03:51:10
Hugo Duncan wrote:
> One of the questions I pondered was whether I should use
> or not. In the end I opted to use it, and I think it works well.
> Using thirteen parameters does however slow the compiler quite
> There is also a slight clash with the Math toolkit library in the
> in that it unconditionaly defines BOOST_PARAMETER_MAX_ARITY to a
> smaller value.
That define has been removed from the Math Toolkit code in SVN.
> BTW, just noticed that math toolkit is in SVN - will it be in the next
> boost release?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk