Boost logo

Boost :

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-13 11:33:11

Douglas Gregor wrote:
> Boost regression test failures
> Report time: 2007-12-12T11:20:18Z
> This report lists all regression test failures on release platforms.
Doug, please change this to "high priority" platforms.

> Detailed report:
> The following platforms have a large number of failures:
> gcc-4.2.1
> intel-linux-9.0
> 3311 failures in 71 libraries (118 are from non-broken platforms)

One of the Sandia gcc-4.2.1 machines ran out of disk space, and there is
some other platform-wide problem causing Sandia intel-linux-9.0 failures.

The failures on these two platforms completely obscure the real failures
we need to be worrying about. Since you are already recognizing that
there is something really wrong, could you not report the detail for
these platforms? Anyone who wants to see the details can go to the
regression reports on the web.

> algorithm/minmax (0 of 4 failures are from non-broken platforms)
Maybe a legend at the top that explains what this means? Or am I the
only one who wonders what a "non-broken platform" is?



Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at