From: Jason Roelofs (jameskilton_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-13 17:25:18
On Dec 13, 2007 5:15 PM, Gennadiy Rozental <rogeeff_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Jurko Gospodnetiæ <jurko.gospodnetic <at> docte.hr> writes:
> > [I am repeating this post as no one replied to it and I guess it could
> > have gotten overlooked in the original thread.]
> Sorry, for the delay. I did see your patch and I am not sure I understand
> How removing somespaces and some variable name change helps this compiler?
> > - predicate_result res( true );
> > + predicate_result res( true );
> > - static Left const L1( 1 );
> > - static Right const R1( 1 );
> > + static Left const leftOne ( 1 );
> > + static Right const rightOne( 1 );
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
I would assume that the whitespace update was extraneous and not meaningful.
I would also assume that L1 is one of those macros defined by the system's
header files. The OP already said that R1 is a macro, so obviously naming a
function as such would be a compiler error.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk