From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-14 00:27:56
"Boris Gubenko" <Boris.Gubenko_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>> You can go ahead. No need to hide it under ifdef either.
> Just to be sure I understand it correctly: even though the fix is safe,
> I was going to conditionalize it with '#ifdef __hpux'. Are you saying
> that there is no need for this conditionalization? (just replacing
> existing code would be fine with me)
Yes. That is what I am saying.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk