From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-16 14:50:20
Peter Dimov wrote:
> Beman Dawes:
>> Where RTTI is useful, but not essential, I'd personally rather not
>> remove it entirely. Instead, the code could respond to a macro
>> (BOOST_NO_RTTI perhaps) and avoid usage when present.
> In non-essential scenarios, often the proper macro to test is
> since typeid(T) does not require the R in RTTI and may be supported even
> when RTTI is off (under MSVC for example).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk