From: Joaquin M Lopez Munoz (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-17 16:45:41
JOAQUIN LOPEZ MU?Z <joaquin <at> tid.es> writes:
> ----- Mensaje original -----
> De: Peter Dimov <pdimov <at> pdimov.com>
> Fecha: Domingo, Diciembre 16, 2007 8:27 pm
> Asunto: Re: [boost] [flyweight] some minor comments
> Para: boost <at> lists.boost.org
> > As I read it, a flyweight<> can ignore all of its template
> > parameters beyond T and still conform to its spec, which is
> > probably not what's intended.
> I tried to be more descriptive than prescriptive so as to
> not overspecifiy the internals of flyweight<>, but you're
> right the formal connection between flyweight<> and its
> template arguments has to be given. I'll try to improve
> this part of the reference.
I've tried to improve on that point, please see
http://tinyurl.com/345s5w and http://tinyurl.com/2s3plu .
Does it look better now to you?
JoaquÃn M LÃ³pez MuÃ±oz
TelefÃ³nica, InvestigaciÃ³n y Desarrollo
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk