From: Anthony Williams (anthony_w.geo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-19 08:25:46
Phil Endecott <spam_from_boost_dev <at> chezphil.org> writes:
> In November Sergey Skorniakov wrote to this list asking about the
> non-thread-safety of Boost.Function and consequently of Boost.Thread
> itself. Steven Watanbee replied pointing out that the problem is
> resolved in the trunk.
Irrespective of any fixes applied to boost.Function, this has been fixed in the
trunk --- boost.thread no longer depends on boost.function.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk