Re: [boost] Non-thread-safe thread library (Boost.Function)

From: Anthony Williams (anthony_w.geo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-19 08:25:46

Phil Endecott <spam_from_boost_dev <at> chezphil.org> writes:

> In November Sergey Skorniakov wrote to this list asking about the 
> non-thread-safety of Boost.Function and consequently of Boost.Thread 
> itself.  Steven Watanbee replied pointing out that the problem is 
> resolved in the trunk.  

Irrespective of any fixes applied to boost.Function, this has been fixed in the
trunk --- boost.thread no longer depends on boost.function.

Anthony