From: Steve M. Robbins (steve_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-19 09:57:18
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 03:02:12PM -0700, Dave Steffen wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 December 2007, Martin Bonner wrote:
> > From: Andreas Harnack
> > > If you think that this doesn't belong to the standard, then
> > > please allow me to ask one question: Why is there a complex
> > > number class in the standard and what does it actually do?
> > There is rather less discussion about possible interfaces for complex
> > numbers than for matrices. (The last time I used matrices in my code, I
> > wanted A=B*C to mean A[i,j] = B[i,j]*C[i,j].)
> Interesting: that's a direct product, which we hardly ever use.
I don't think that's a direct product; c.f.
Wikipedia suggests it's called the Hadamard (or Schur or entrywise)
product; c.f. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_multiplication
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk