From: Ilya Sokolov (fal_delivery_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-26 17:01:22
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>>>>>>> 2. Unfortunately original test modult function signature is
unacceptable for DLL initialization. So i had to introduce new one.
>> I still don't see why is it unacceptable. Can you state it explicitly?
> Hmm. How to state it more explicitly. How about this:
> It does not link.
boost::unit_test::test_suite* init_unit_test_suite( int, char*  )
>> Problem arise with library that should work on both platforms, with
and without dll support.
> What platforms are you talking about?
> Why the solutions I provided are not satisfactory?
they are too complex for such simple problem
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk