Re: [boost] XML

From: Jose (jmalv04_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-09 10:17:42

Hi,

I have used both rapidxml and pugixml (which inspired rapidxml)
http://code.google.com/p/pugixml/ and they are the best c++ xml libs I found
(if you don't need an xml validating parser).

RapidXML will be supported or is supported by the boost property-tree
library but that does not mean it can be included without a review.

It would be great if the authors can put forward one of the libraries (or a
combined one) for a Boost review. It would be a great addition !

regards
jose
On Jan 9, 2008 2:28 PM, Stefano Delli Ponti <stefano.delliponti_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> Phil Endecott wrote:
> > Barco You wrote:
> >> There are xerces and miniXML ... I think it's the real reason not to do
> so
> >> much redundance. :)
> >
> > There's also RapidXML by Marcin Kalicinski (Boost license), which I
> > wasn't aware of when Stefan presented his libxml2-based library:
> >
> > http://rapidxml.sourceforge.net/
> > http://rapidxml.sourceforge.net/manual.html
>
> By the way, it seems that RapidXML will be included, without much
> fanfare, in the upcoming 1.35, as a detail of the property-tree library.
> Is this correct?
>
> Sted
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>