From: Jose (jmalv04_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-09 10:17:42
I have used both rapidxml and pugixml (which inspired rapidxml)
http://code.google.com/p/pugixml/ and they are the best c++ xml libs I found
(if you don't need an xml validating parser).
RapidXML will be supported or is supported by the boost property-tree
library but that does not mean it can be included without a review.
It would be great if the authors can put forward one of the libraries (or a
combined one) for a Boost review. It would be a great addition !
On Jan 9, 2008 2:28 PM, Stefano Delli Ponti <stefano.delliponti_at_[hidden]>
> Phil Endecott wrote:
> > Barco You wrote:
> >> There are xerces and miniXML ... I think it's the real reason not to do
> >> much redundance. :)
> > There's also RapidXML by Marcin Kalicinski (Boost license), which I
> > wasn't aware of when Stefan presented his libxml2-based library:
> > http://rapidxml.sourceforge.net/
> > http://rapidxml.sourceforge.net/manual.html
> By the way, it seems that RapidXML will be included, without much
> fanfare, in the upcoming 1.35, as a detail of the property-tree library.
> Is this correct?
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk