From: Andreas Huber (ahd6974-spamboostorgtrap_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-09 13:56:50
>> So my question is: Why does including thread.hpp require linking against
>> date_time library? It seems that it is not needed at all?
> The new trunk/release version of boost.thread has replaced uses of the
> xtime type with uses of the date_time library in the functions that take
> timeouts: sleep, timed_lock, timed_wait, etc.
Ok, but then I'd only need to link against the date_time library if I
actually use these functions, correct? Autolink currently forces me to link
against date_time even with the following program:
static void ThreadFunction()
std::cout << "Hello from a boost thread" << std::endl;
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk