Re: [boost] Boost.Tests: Unit test defines own main() function, why?

From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-11 15:46:08

eg <egoots <at> gmail.com> writes:

> 
> Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> >>
> >>>> This seems to be one of the most important questions: Why do you not
> >>>> replace http://www.boost.org/libs/test/doc/index.html with
> >>>> http://www.patmedia.net/~rogeeff/html/index.html?
> >>>> Does the content need to be transferred from HTML first or what steps 
are
> >>>> missing?
> >>> 1. I do not how to do it
> >>> 2. I do not know if it possible at all.
> >> Oh, come on, man.  That's just too hard to swallow.
> >> http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2005/08/91786.php
> > 
> > Yeah. Since I never got to do it, I forgot about it. At this point I will 
wait 
> > for 1.35
> > 
> 
> It appears to me that the new docs are not yet in the 1.35 release 
> branch. Should they be?

Yes, they should. And yes they are not there yet. I've spent last couple weeks 
updating them with recent changes in Boost.Test. New beta now in regular 
location in patmedia.net/~rogeeff. 

The only one major problem that's left is incorporating my docs with official 
boostbook. The primary obstacle from me is lack of any support for this 
component. I am not even sure there is any particular person responsible for 
it. I need to introduce quite big changes into boostbook and in a past I was 
not able to get any responce for even simple support requests. I am planing to 
follow up un Boost.docs list with conreate list of changes I need. Also I'll 
need changes in boost.Build since I need additional options for xsltproc.

Gennadiy