Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-11 21:26:43

Next message: Joel de Guzman: "[boost] [switch_] Case Concept [ was Re: [Boost-users] formal review of Switch library...]"
Previous message: Stjepan Rajko: "[boost] Switch library review - summary of discussion so far"
In reply to: Benoit Sigoure: "Re: [boost] Boost.Tests: Unit test defines own main() function, why?"
Next in thread: Benoit Sigoure: "Re: [boost] Boost.Tests: Unit test defines own main() function, why?"
Reply: Benoit Sigoure: "Re: [boost] Boost.Tests: Unit test defines own main() function, why?"

Benoit Sigoure <tsuna <at> lrde.epita.fr> writes:
> Thanks for your code. It grieves me that Boost.Test is the *only*
> library for which I have to write "special cases" only because it's
> not "well-behaved".

In what sence? How do you define well behaved?

Next message: Joel de Guzman: "[boost] [switch_] Case Concept [ was Re: [Boost-users] formal review of Switch library...]"
Previous message: Stjepan Rajko: "[boost] Switch library review - summary of discussion so far"
In reply to: Benoit Sigoure: "Re: [boost] Boost.Tests: Unit test defines own main() function, why?"
Next in thread: Benoit Sigoure: "Re: [boost] Boost.Tests: Unit test defines own main() function, why?"
Reply: Benoit Sigoure: "Re: [boost] Boost.Tests: Unit test defines own main() function, why?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk