From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-11 21:26:43
Benoit Sigoure <tsuna <at> lrde.epita.fr> writes:
> Thanks for your code. It grieves me that Boost.Test is the *only*
> library for which I have to write "special cases" only because it's
> not "well-behaved".
In what sence? How do you define well behaved?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk