Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Jens Seidel (jensseidel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-14 02:26:16

Next message: Jens Seidel: "Re: [boost] Boost.Tests: Unit test defines own main() function, why?"
Previous message: Gennadiy Rozental: "Re: [boost] Boost.Tests: Unit test defines own main() function, why?"
Next in thread: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] Errors in status/explicit-failures-markup.xml?"
Reply: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] Errors in status/explicit-failures-markup.xml?"

Hi,

I noticed that status/explicit-failures-markup.xml seems to contain some
errors. I really wonder e.g. about "These compilers are unfortunately
able to correctly compile". It looks like there is a "not" missing in
this sentence (multiple times!).

Jens

Next message: Jens Seidel: "Re: [boost] Boost.Tests: Unit test defines own main() function, why?"
Previous message: Gennadiy Rozental: "Re: [boost] Boost.Tests: Unit test defines own main() function, why?"
Next in thread: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] Errors in status/explicit-failures-markup.xml?"
Reply: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] Errors in status/explicit-failures-markup.xml?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk