From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-18 14:26:34
Peter Dimov wrote:
> What is the reason to prefer the current instance/lease formulation instead
> typedef ... instance_type;
> instance_type instance(); // automatically serves as a lease
As we can't expose the instance when automatic locking is done, it is
supposed to provide a means to not have to access the instance directly.
> (Also, why mutexed_singleton? Mutexed is not a word; synchronized_singleton
> Apologies if these have already been answered.
No, they haven't. And there were no complaints about the no-word either,
so far :-).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk