Re: [boost] Lock-free atomic_shared_ptr<T>?

From: Cory Nelson (phrosty_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-18 15:43:39

On Jan 18, 2008 9:56 AM, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> using shared_ptr<T> as a value type. The implementation I'm thinking
> of uses hazard pointers
> (http://erdani.org/publications/cuj-2004-12.pdf) and double-wide-cas
> (cmpxchg16b on x86-64). So I have three questions for this list:

Athlon 64s (pre-dual core) do not have cmpxchg16b - how do you plan to
get around that?

-- 
Cory Nelson