Re: [boost] [review] Fast track review of Boost.Utility/Singletonbegins today

From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-19 17:25:49

"Tobias Schwinger" <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:fmqifd$l3k$1_at_ger.gmane.org...
>> It's not my responsibility to do a unit testing for you. From where I 
>> stand
>> any feature which is not backed up with unit test, can't be considerred
>> supported.
>
> From where I stand testing is a minor concern as long as it's obvious
> that something /can/ work -- in dubio pro reo.

Can you provide formal proof? Nothing is obvios to me. And without unit test 
is useless.

>>>> Or do you expect us to believe your word?
>>>>
>>> Believe whatever you want .
>>
>> I believe your library doesn't work for DLLs. And you didn't even provide 
>> a
>> test to prove me wrong.
>
> The purpose of testing is not to prove anything -- it about detecting
> defects.

The purpose of unit testing is to prove that there are no defects and 
program/library/class works as expected.

Gennadiy