Re: [boost] [review] Review of Flyweight library started January 21and still running!: static flyweights

From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-28 06:36:26

JOAQUIN LOPEZ MUÑOZ wrotes

> The destruction order is the correct one:
>
>   static_var2
>   static_var1
>   holder
>
> I guess you're being misled by the definition of the initializer
> fwinit: Its presence forces holder initialization *unless* this
> initialization has already taken place, which is the case here,
> due to the previous definition of static_var1. So, your code
> is entirely equivalent to

>   static flyweight<std::string> static_var1("safe_or_unsafe1");
>   static flyweight<std::string> static_var2("safe_or_unsafe2");

You are right. The destruction order is correct.
I have associated the static initialization of the holder and the fwinit 
variable
and have forgotten that the static_var1 initialization forces the static
initialization of the holder.

Sorry
---------------------------
Vicente Juan Botet Escriba