From: Hervé Brönnimann (hervebronnimann_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-30 00:26:35
Theo: I would add, to dimension-agnostic, also coordinate-agnostic.
See the paper "Coordinate-free geometyry ADT" by Mann, Litke and
DeRose (http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/191514.html). I think they make
-- Hervé Brönnimann hervebronnimann_at_[hidden] On Jan 29, 2008, at 7:17 PM, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote: > I just had a glance on the library. One thing that strikes me is > its 2D > perspective, which > is not reflected in the names. I would at least call the namespace > geometry2d or the > classes point2d .... It really seems awkward to use the generic names > for the specific > 2D case. That being said, from my point of view any geometry basic > layer > (ie basic > representation not the sophisticated algorithms) should be as > dimension > agnostic as possible... > but I may be biased. > > Regards, > > Theo.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk