From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-01 08:00:25
Andreas Pokorny wrote:
Hi. Sorry for not answering for such a long time. I got caught up in a
> 1) What features do you plan to add before you can post it for
> review? Have you considered breaking it up in several parts?
I will very likely break it up in the binary part and the text part.
However, I need at least a proof-of-concept implementation of the text
part, because I want some components to work in both parts, and the
interface I use currently may prove unsuitable for that.
The binary part doesn't need many more features, as it is.
> I mean do you intend to get a complete iostream replacement
> with the first version?
Oh no. There's the whole formatting thing that I most definitely won't
tackle in the first version.
> 2) Where is the code? I only see:
Hmm, that's the contents of the lib subdirectory.
There should be a boost subdirectory as well. And there should be more
in the lib subdirectory.
Oh no, the tarball really contains only this stuff. Hehe, I really
should have looked at that sooner. :-(
Well, whatever. Preview release 2 coming up soon. I just need some
testing under Win32.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk