Re: [boost] Review of Logging library begins today February 4th

From: John Torjo (john.groups_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-05 15:45:54

> The new version seems to improve things somewhat in that it all seems to be in
> the headers, however I still strongly dislike the use of a preprocessor macro to
> tell the headers whether or not to use Unicode. There are two problems with this:
>
>   
I've re-looked at the implementation. I would say a few parts can be 
made Unicode-independent rather easy.

However to make the char_type part of the logger will require a bit of work.

To summarize:
- I don't remember anyone asking for this before
- It's certainly doable. I can implement this after the review.

Best,
John

-- 
http://John.Torjo.com -- C++ expert
http://blog.torjo.com
... call me only if you want things done right