|
Boost : |
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-08 17:42:08
> Hey, would you mind running against lock-in-order? I'd love to
> confirm what I've been preachin'. ;-) Or if you see lock-in-order as
> better, then better for me to hear it sooner rather than later...
No difference on single core, ~20s (vs ~14s for try/backoff) on dual core
Pentium-D with lock2 changed to:
void lock2_( mutex & m1, mutex & m2 )
{
if( &m1 < &m2 )
{
m1.lock();
m2.lock();
}
else
{
m2.lock();
m1.lock();
}
}
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk