Re: [boost] Review of Logging library begins today February 4th

From: John Torjo (john.groups_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-09 21:33:39

Hi Bruce,
> I am a user of many Boost libraries and far from a C++ guru, so my
> comments are from that perspective.
>
>   
Thanks for the positive review!
> * What is your evaluation of the design?
>
> It is very flexible, it is easy to modify one's usage of it and not
> too hard to use.  It has been very useful for me.
>
>   
Glad to know someone enjoys it :)
> * What is your evaluation of the implementation?
>
> It generates some compiler warnings that should be eliminated.  Other
> than that, I have not run into any serious issues.
>
>   
Yes will do.
> * What is your evaluation of the documentation?
>
> It is quite thorough.  It takes a little more digging than ideal to
> get started right out of the box.  That is just a question of
> organization, all the necessary content seems to be there.
>
>   
Thanks!
> * How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick
> reading? In-depth study?
>
> I would describe myself as a light user of the library.  I have used
> it for a single logger with multiple levels and multiple destinations,
> probably a very common use case.
>
>   
I would say so ;)
> * Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library?
>
> Yes.
>
>   
Thanks!

Best,
John

-- 
http://John.Torjo.com -- C++ expert
http://blog.torjo.com
... call me only if you want things done right