|
Boost : |
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-13 18:40:36
OK gurus - I looked into this a little bit and now I have a question.
The code causing the problem looks like:
namespace boost_132 {
using namespace boost;
// bunch of old code using boost namespace here
}
This was added to provide enough information in order to de-serialize
shared pointers saved under the older system. By wrapping this in the
namespace boost_132, it was my intention that the directive
"using namespace boost;" apply only to the code in that namespace.
It seems that the complaint is that its applying to code outside the
namespace
boost_132.
Is my understanding of the scope of using directives wrong, or is this
a compiler error?
Then the question arises as to how it should be addressed. I don't see
how the workaround for the borland compiler applies here. What I wanted
to avoid was going through the code line by line. This is just imported
code
which in only there to support de-serialization of older archives which use
shared pointer so I didn't want to create maintainence issue. So one thing
is that the code should be included conditionally with something like
BOOST_SERIALIZATION_SUPPORT_132_SHARED pointers. Aside
from that I'm willing to hear ideas on this.
Robert Ramey
"Johan Råde" <rade_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:fov8qu$63e$1_at_ger.gmane.org...
> Sean Huang wrote:
>
>> This is very similar (or the same) to
>> http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/1285. Unfortunately, Robert did
>> not
>> want to take the fix proposed.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Sean
>
> It is exactly the same problem.
>
> --Johan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk