From: Michael Marcin (mmarcin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-14 12:46:11
JoaquÃn M LÃ³pezMuÃ±oz wrote:
>> Is this possible with the current version? Is it a reasonable to apply
>> flyweight in this manner?
> Well, yours is a demanding scenario, but I hope the changes I'll do
> to the lib will cope with your needs. The current version of
> the library is too limited for what you're after.
Awesome, I look forward to the updates and when they are ready I will
make another push towards replacing our caching with Flyweight.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk