From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-14 13:30:11
Paul A Bristow wrote:
> So on balance, I think following the rules used in Math Toolkit
> sounds the best compromise.
> "These rules are chosen to be compatible with the behaviour of
> ISO/IEC 9899:1999 Programming languages - C and with the Draft
> Technical Report on C++ Library Extensions, 2005-06-24, section
> 5.2.1, paragraph 5.
Right the idea is to be compatible with what C99 and C++0x do when an
integer argument is passed to a math function.
The other issue is that if:
returned an integer, then presumably it can only return 0, which isn't
exactly right :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk