Boost logo

Boost :

From: Johan Torp (johan.torp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-03-09 12:39:03

Peter Dimov-5 wrote:
>> Thanks for the clarification. This solution forces the use of shared_ptrs
>> and might keep a Foo instance alive a little bit longer. Especially the
>> latter requirement is a no-no for me.
> If thread A is in the middle of a call to foo.f() and thread B attempts to
> destroy foo, your only options are (1) keep foo alive a little bit longer
> or
> (2) crash. Of course I may be missing something.

No, I believe you are correct, that's why I chose my own "architecture
intrusive" way of implementing thread safe signals.

View this message in context:
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at