Re: [boost] [signals/threadsafe version] Atomic disconnects

From: Johan Torp (johan.torp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-03-09 12:47:55

Frank Mori Hess-2 wrote:
> 
>> The callbackrequester implementation -typically a queue - switches to
>> the thread which the synchronous slot "belongs" to. This is of course
>> very intrusive to the entire design of an application -
> 
> Yes, I don't think this belongs in a signals library.  
> 

Absolutely.

However, I think the possibly delayed disconnect semantics are very
unintuitive and should be pointed out more than clearly in the
documentation.

Johan
 
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-signals-threadsafe-version--Atomic-disconnects-tp15412841p15943320.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.