From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-03-13 12:24:43
Phil Bouchard wrote:
> "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> If I understand correctly, none of this code is technically portable; it
>> is only "portable in practice" because of the way C++ is commonly
>> implemented. Is that correct?
>> It's not necessarily an argument against these proposals, but all Boost
>> library submissions should be very clear about where they rely on
>> unspecified or undefined behavior.
> No it is perfectly portable, this function called "roofof" simply cannot be
> applied to classes having virtual inheritance. It can be kept as an
> internal routine quite simply and used with PODs and classes having simple
roofof /does/ use undefined behavior.
You can't just go dereferencing the null pointer...
((T *)(0)->* q)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk