From: Frank Mori Hess (frank.hess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-03-19 12:40:57
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 08:39 am, Peter Dimov wrote:
> After a brief consideration I think I agree with your approach, though.
> Nothing better comes to mind. But it would be nice if the deleter
> replacement happens only if shared_from_this has been called.
I think that could be done, but would probably require a mutex to protect
against shared_from_this() getting called concurrently with ownership
transfer. Of course, the lazy initialization in init_internal_shared_once()
from the patch in trac probably needs a mutex too, or to use call_once from
> To proceed, we need two new tests. One that tests currently valid code that
> will continue to work the same way
Maybe some of the existing test functions can be turned into templates where
the template type parameter is the type owned by the shared_ptr? Then the
test could be run on a type that does and doesn't inherit from
enable_shared_from_this. I haven't looked at most of the tests, but
something like that should work fine on get_deleter_test.cpp.
> , and another that tests the new
I can add some stuff to shared_from_this_test.cpp that calls shared_from_this
Regarding the get_deleter breakage, I think I can modify
sp_counted_impl_pd/sp_counted_impl_pda so their get_deleter methods try to
unwrap the deleter D if it is of type detail::deleter_wrapper (a class I'm
currently using as the deleter for the shared_from_this pointers ).
Maybe I should svn copy a little branch somewhere like
sandbox-branches/fmhess/enable_shared_from_this/ for the files I've modified,
so you can see my code immediately instead of waiting for a patch posted on
trac or wherever?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk